A national survey of 1,000 employees revealed that for
those who work in their company’s front office, the most despised
administrative task is preparing and sending office mail, according to Postalocity.com,
an online mailing service.
Sending
invoices was specifically cited as the least favorite type of mail for half the
group. Managing email came in second. The survey allowed participants to choose
their own response, and the responses covered the spectrum of daily workplace
frustration.
Other
responses included “dealing with idiots,” “tedious, monotonous work,” “disciplinary
actions” and “yelling.” Almost half (43%) “hate” sending bulk mail, and associated
tasks and troubles as having to lick envelopes; printer jams; running out of
supplies like paper, ink and envelopes; misaligned printing on labels; getting
back undeliverable mail; and printing addresses upside down.
Front-office
workers rated their least-favorite tasks:
Office
mailings
Managing
email
Filing
Meetings
Dealing
with people
Answering
the phone
Planning
lunch
Doing
payroll
Cleaning
In general, working
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Fewer than two-thirds of advisers (64%) hold a positive
outlook on the markets for the next three years, according to the latest Financial
Professional Outlook from Russell Investments—the lowest adviser sentiment in
five years. But the distractions of market noise could mean that nervous advisers
and their clients miss an opportunity for conscious, structured conversations
about income goals, Russell cautions.
Adviser sentiment hit a high of 87% early in 2014, but in the
current outlook more than half of advisers (56%) cited concerns about future
market volatility. Client uncertainty, at 53%, matches the adviser sentiment. Together,
these concerns may loom over adviser conversations with clients, distracting
from long-term planning efforts.
Market volatility, driven by recent spikes, probably fed into
other conversations initiated by investors, the Financial Professional Outlook
contends, such as portfolio performance (cited by 48% of advisers) and global
events (35%). But instead of buckling, Russell recommends turning the current
sentiment to an advantage, and using it as an opportunity to refocus client
conversations.
“It’s key for advisers to not let these concerns derail their
efforts to have long-term planning conversations with clients based on their
goals and needs for the future,” says Phill Rogerson, managing director,
consulting and product for Russell Investments’ U.S. adviser-sold business. “One
way advisers can address current market concerns is to provide context as to
what a typical market looks like, in historical terms. Advisers should be explaining what typical asset
class and broader economic performance looks like, and use that as a foundation to
help clients understand and navigate the increasingly complex investing
environment.”
More conversations about long-term planning are needed.
Nearly one-third of advisers (30%) said as many as half of their clients are
not on track to maintain adequate assets for an optimal retirement. Advisers
surveyed said the two key challenges they face are setting reasonable
expectations around spending (55%) and maintaining the sustainable spending
plans they do manage to create with clients (44%).
NEXT:
An investing risk advisers may be overlooking
When it comes to investing strategies, advisers may not be
fully considering the risks of chasing yield. An overwhelming majority of
advisers surveyed said that they believe yield-focused investment strategies
(or strategies that rely on dividends and interest alone to provide income) are
a strong option for some or all of their clients.
But paradoxically few advisers believe it is a superior
strategy, pointing to potential risks as a main deterrent from pursuing such
strategies, including capital erosion because of inflation (53%) and higher
credit risks (40%). Only 11% of advisers said they would recommend these
strategies to the majority of their clients.
A primary hazard of over-focusing on yield is that it’s not
always an optimal investment approach, according Rogerson. “These strategies
can actually put sustainable income at risk,” he points out. “To help reduce
the level of risk and portfolio volatility, we believe that income solutions
should pursue a responsible, sustainable level of yield through a
well-diversified, multi-asset approach.”
Rogerson counsels advisers to evaluate the risks and potential
opportunities of an investment strategy as a matter of course. The other
component is encouraging clients to balance long- and short-term
income needs and to be mindful of global diversification, risk and adaptability, among other
factors.
“The best way to manage these four factors is to take a total-return approach to portfolio management,” Rogerson says, and advisers agree. Of
the advisers who said that yield-focused strategies were not a good option for
all of their clients, more than-two thirds (70%) would recommend a total-return
approach which looks at the sum of interest, dividends and capital appreciation
when considering the ability to generate income.
“Instead of focusing
on short-term market events, advisers need to remember to center conversations
on client goals,” Rogerson says. “Clients may call with apprehensions about the
market, but advisers need to be able to defuse these concerns and move the
conversation toward one that instead weighs the current progress of the
client’s portfolio against their desired outcome. This way, actions stay
connected to the clients’ individual needs without jeopardizing their future
financial security.”
Russell’s Financial Professional Outlook
includes responses from 297 financial advisers working in nearly 213 national,
regional and independent advisory firms nationwide. It was conducted between
October 6 and October 21.