With changing tax laws
on both a state and national level, taxes have grown more complex. So have the
reasons for attempting to take write-offs for tax year 2012. The Minnesota
Society of Certified Public Accountants surveyed its 9,400 CPA members for some
of the wackier attempts and came up with:
A ballerina tried to
deduct the cost of a tummy tuck.
One woman tried to write
off Botox expenses as an “image enhancement” expense.
A pianist tried to
claim manicures as a business expense.
A farmer tried to claim
food and veterinary expenses for his toy poodle as a farm-building “guard dog.”
One woman tried to
deduct her gambling losses as a charity donation.
Many reasons for
deducting the cost of a swimming pool were offered by various clients. (One
filer failed to realize that he needed to actually have children and dependents
in order to claim them.)
One filer tried to
deduct tanning-bed expenses.
One woman hoped to add a
deduction by writing off the cost of Zumba exercise classes.
“Creativity is rewarded
in many parts of society—but not by the IRS,” noted Minnesota Society of CPAs (MNCPA) Chair Barbara Steinhauser.
The majority of workers polled for the 2013
Retirement Confidence Survey (RCS) indicated support for guaranteed income
options in their retirement plans.
According to MetLife, an underwriter
for the RCS, when asked if their employer’s retirement savings plan offers the
option to allow participants to put their money into an insurance product that
pays income each month for the rest of the participant’s life, 58% of workers
polled for the RCS say their employer’s plan does not (to the best of their
knowledge). However, when workers who have this option available to them were asked
if they think they will/would use this option when they retire, six in ten
workers (61%) said they would select the annuity.
The RCS, released by the Employee
Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) and Mathew Greenwald & Associates
(see “Saving
for Retirement Easier Said than Done”), found nearly half of
workers (46%) favor partial annuitization—allowing a portion of a worker’s
balance in an employer-sponsored retirement savings account to be automatically
converted at retirement to an insurance product that pays guaranteed income
each month for the rest of the account owner’s life.
Eight in ten workers (82%) are somewhat or very confident
that they will do a good job of converting their savings and investments to
income for their retirement. MetLife noted they are more confident than the 72%
of retirees who said they are confident that they have done a good job in that
regard.
(Cont’d…)
According to MetLife, the difference
between retirees and workers in their confidence regarding converting their
savings and investments to income is all the more notable because of the
variations from where that income is expected to come. More than nine in ten
(93%) retirees identify Social Security as an income source, and 75% say it is
a significant source. Among workers, 78% say that Social Security will be a
source of income in retirement, but only 43% expect it to be significant.
Sixty percent of retirees identify a
defined benefit (DB) pension plan as a source of income, and 59% say it is a
significant source. In contrast, 72% of workers say they will need to rely on
defined contribution (DC) plans. Retirees rely far less on defined contribution
(DC) plans, with 20% saying DC plans are a significant source of retirement
income.
“As workers’ interest in retirement income continues to
grow, there are now a number of different retirement income approaches
available in the qualified plan marketplace,” said Roberta Rafaloff, vice
president, Institutional Income Annuities, MetLife. “This year’s RCS findings
echo other studies, which found that workers are asking for retirement income
options from their plan sponsors.”