2018 RPAY – Ascende Wealth Advisers, Inc.

PA: Tell us about your practice and how you and your team members got into advising retirement plans

Ascende Wealth Advisers, Inc. (AWAI) was founded by Ascende on February 1, 2011. AWAI is a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered investment advisory firm dedicated to providing unbiased investment advice by acting as either an ERISA 3(21) co-fiduciary or an ERISA 3(38) investment fiduciary to corporate sponsored qualified and nonqualified plans as well as international and offshore savings arrangements. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Our team members either have, or are trained to have experience in both plan investment advice as well as true plan consulting expertise equivalent to anything an employer may expect from the largest consulting firms in the U.S. Our team members are just as likely to be working on calculating match true-ups, conducting corrections under EPCRS, or reviewing a plan’s compensation definition versus a company’s payroll system definitions as they are to be researching mutual funds or building defined benefit (DB) liability driven investment strategies.

Our team members came into this business from all walks of life.  While some were recruited directly into Ascende/AWAI from college and have learned the business through various certifications and one-on-one training, others started as paralegals, recordkeeping administrators, pension plan corporate trustees and compliance testing and plan document specialists as well as investment advisers and investment managers.

 

PA: What have you done in the past year to improve participants’ retirement readiness?

We have historically leveraged both the recordkeeping vendor’s data, as well as client census data, to try and build a complete picture of the plan’s participant retirement health levels. We have routinely asked our vendors to calculate the gap analysis based on criteria agreed upon with the plan sponsor, depending on the vendor’s capabilities or limitations.

For our own analysis, we use plan participant data from the employer census data, combined with account balance data to create a series of PivotTables that enables us to look at plan data based on employee age, service, gender, geographic location and HCE/NHCE status relative to their contribution rates, catch-up use and maximization, match maximization, health-savings account (HAS) use and maximization, average account balance and rates of plan participation.  This data allows us to more effectively target our communications to the employees that need it most.  In 2018 and beyond, we will be further leveraging this data to help us identify employee groups that require more hand holding and one-on-one communication services.

 

PA: Describe any particularly initiatives you have led with your customer base in the past 12 months (investment or education or plan design or communication) or any plans for the next 12 months.

We have been working on multiple initiatives over the last year to assist our plan sponsors in the health and success of their plans and plan participants, including implementing advanced financial wellness solutions for many of our clients over the past 12 months. This means going beyond simply encouraging participation in the 401(k), our financial wellness programs focuses on a holistic approach to employee’s daily lives. To encourage participation, we have helped employers run a variety of campaigns to encourage participation in the program, and even integrated the scoring system with health and welfare wellness programs to enable employers to offer a single wellness benefit.

Additionally, AWAI has been leading conversations with employers to eliminate revenue sharing and convert to either an employer-paid model, or a model where employees pay a pre-defined per capita or pro-rata fee for plan services.

We have also been partnering with some of our clients to provide employee education and investment management services to help employees better understand how to use their HSAs more effectively. We provide group education to employees on the benefits of HSAs and some strategies for getting the most out of their use in paying health expenses as well as understanding how to invest your HSA dollars most effectively. We have also been working with employers to bring down the cost of HSA investments since these accounts typically have much investment management higher costs than 401(k) plans.

In 2015, when the Department of Labor sent a letter to plan sponsors encouraging them to evaluate the quality of their existing plan auditor as well as what to do when conducting RFPs for plan audit services,  AWAI launched an initiative to review and evaluate 100% of our client’s auditors using the criteria provided by the DOL and adding multiple additional questions we felt were prudent.

We have implemented custom liability driven investing (LDI) strategies for DB plans in this market using our own proprietary investment modeling. We have successfully reduced plan expenses by no less than 30% for each of these plans and have improved their funded status through actively managed strategic asset allocations of index funds and ETFs that also leverage the principles of LDI to hedge liabilities as the funded status improves.

As part of our 2018 initiatives, we will be conducting more one-on-one education meetings with employees using data compiled from our Health & Retirement assessment and other retirement readiness tools to create targeted education campaigns and one-on-one meetings designed to improve outcomes at the individual level.

Furthermore, we will be working with our vendors to take an active role in researching their preparedness relative to the five standards of Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover as laid out by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Vendors will be sent a questionnaire to respond to that is more in-depth than the questions posed in a typical 401(k) RFP. This questionnaire will then be updated and maintained and provided in any 401(k) RFP as an addendum to the vendor search so that employers can be assured that their vendors are prepared at a level consistent with the latest thinking, tools, and technology as necessary to combat this rising threat. This report will also be kept on file for existing clients to use as part of any audit they may be required to respond to.  We believe that this issue has already become a standard fiduciary best practice and our clients will be at the forefront of meeting and exceeding this standard.

 

PA: As a retirement plan adviser, what do you take the most pride in?

Developing a relationship of trust with employees and employers. As an adviser, clients expect us to manage plan fees, monitor fund performance, and manage their fiduciary responsibility. These tasks are vital components of our business and lay at the heart of our practice. However, we take the most pride in extending our relationships beyond just those basic tasks. Focusing on holistic financial wellness and supporting employee’s retirement goals are the most effective way we have to make a real difference in our clients’ lives. In order to achieve these goals we have to build trusting relationships with our employer clients and their employees.

 

PA: What benchmarks do you use to measure plan and client success? How do you react to clients or prospects who don’t share your goals for their retirement plan?

Leveraging our recordkeeping vendor partners, we view plan success through a number of key metrics including, but not limited to, plan participation rates, participant deferral rates, target date/managed account usage, etc. We compare our client’s statistics versus those of their same size peers and peers in similar industries. Through AWAI we were also able to offer a number of survey statistics to illustrate to our clients and prospects how their plans compare against their similar competition based on their industry.

Another key metric that many recordkeepers now illustrate to plan sponsors is the percentage of plan participants that are “on track for retirement”.  While we like this metric, sometime it can be misleading as it may not capture a participant’s entire retirement account (for example they may have a sizeable balance at a previous company retirement plan that is not captured, a pension benefit from a previous employer, etc.).  We think that in order to truly capture whether someone is on track for retirement is to meet with them face-to-face (either in a group setting or one-on-one meetings) to understand that individual employee’s unique circumstances and to capture their entire financial position.

 

PA: What are the most important issues that your plan sponsors face with their company retirement plan, and what specific actions do you take to assist them in overcoming those issues?

In the face of increased consumerization of employee benefits, one of the most important issues facing plan sponsors is the inability to effectively promote utilization of the plan. It is easy for employees to feel overwhelmed and frustrated with the variety of choices and volume of decisions to be made. The basic steps to begin investing for retirement consists of completing an enrollment form, determining the appropriate amount of pay to contribute, and allocating among a wide variety of investment options with varying risk tolerances. No matter how easy vendors or recordkeepers make this process, it is easy for an employee to get hung up or confused and say they’ll come back to it later. Even for those plans with automatic enrollment, designed to make the process as easy as possible, an employee can be left wondering where their money went, what it is being invested in, and when they can get it back.

In an industry where it seems the answer to every question is more technology and less human interaction, we strive to be the partners for these employees and meet with them face-to-face. We work to provide general education on why retirement savings is important, assist with enrollment, help determine a good starting amount to contribute, or walk through a personal risk tolerance assessment.  The goal is helping as many participants as possible take that first step, or smooth out their current path, towards investing for their future.

 

PA: How do you select what recordkeeping providers to work with and how many relationships do you currently have across your client base?

We regularly work with the following 21 national providers: ADP, Ascensus, Charles Schwab, Empower, Fidelity, Guardian, John Hancock, Lincoln Financial, MassMutual, Nationwide, OneAmerica, Newport Group, Principal, Prudential, Securian, T. Rowe Price, The Standard, TransAmerica, Vanguard, VOYA and Wells Fargo. Each vendor goes through an extensive, regular and recurring vetting process and must offer an open architecture investment platform with no proprietary fund requirements in order to be recommended.  We will also work with any providers, especially if they are the plan sponsor’s existing vendor and fit the needs of the sponsor and their plan participants and the fees are reasonable for the services provided.  Since we do not receive, and have never received, remuneration of any type from any of these providers, it is our policy that any possible services they may be able to provide to AWAI is irrelevant in our analysis. AWAI and QPA is recordkeeper-agnostic and works diligently to ensure that each of our clients is served by the recordkeeper that is the best fit for its unique circumstances.

2018 RPAY – UBS Retirement Plan Consulting

PA: Tell us about your practice and how you and your team members got into advising retirement plans.

Our team relies on three core strengths: We are experienced, disciplined and innovative. I began my financial career in 1983, before 401(k) plans were prevalent. I built a broad knowledge of not only 401(k) resources, but a wide range of retirement plans and options. I help provide plan sponsors and their employees with retirement options that reflect their rapidly changing needs. In this industry, you need to work hard to keep your knowledge sharp while remaining flexible and able to adapt to new ideas.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

 

PA: How is your team/process/structure unique? How has it evolved? Where will you be in five years?

Currently, our team consists of two financial advisers and a client service assistant. What I believe makes us different is that we are husband and wife, Bruce and Bernadette Lanser, with a combined 60 years of retirement planning experience. As a couple working in the financial industry we are able to collaborate and share our perspectives, provide insights based on our combined knowledge and experience. However, as spouses we understand how families plan for their financial futures. Our team also believes in building the future– for the last several years we have employed a college intern to begin teaching the next generation.

In five years, we see our team devoting more time and resources to helping clients manage their fiduciary responsibilities that go along with offering lifetime retirement options to participants, and helping employees better understand their own retirement planning.

 

PA: What have you done in the past year to improve participants’ retirement readiness?

Our clients are early adopters of automatic enrollment programs that get people saving and the results are incredible. As a result, one client now has a participation rate of 99.9% with only one person out of approximately 800 employees not saving in the 401(k) plan. We have increased the default retirement contribution rate to 6%, up from 3%, and the auto escalation rate is now at 2% annually for most clients. In addition, participants who contribute less than 6% of their income to retirement savings were moved up to 6%. We also periodically reenroll people who have opted out of the auto escalation programs. In addition to helping people invest effectively over their careers, we help them convert those assets into an income stream once they approach retirement.

Studies from the University of Pennsylvania Pension Research Council show that participants who are invested in a managed approach, such as a target date fund do 2% per year better than those that invest on their own. Here’s why that 2% truly matters–the compounded impact over many years could double employee retirement savings. To help plan sponsors meet their fiduciary responsibilities and better serve employees’ savings needs, all defaulted participants are moved to QDIA (Qualified Default Investment Accounts). The result has been that typically around 90% of participants are properly invested.

To ensure plans remain on track we monitor the expense ratios of the funds in our plans to determine if we can take advantage of lower cost share classes. If we can offer the same funds at a lower cost, our clients’ employees enjoy more value from their retirement investments.

 

PA: Describe any particularly initiatives you have led with your customer base in the past 12 months (investment or education or plan design or communication) or any plans for the next 12 months.

We have helped clients meet their 408(b)(2) obligations by benchmarking plan fees and services to ensure they are reasonable. We also have conducted fiduciary training sessions to help clients better understand prudent fiduciary practices.

 

PA: As a retirement plan adviser, what do you take the most pride in?

Our team is most proud of the positive impact we strive to make on the retirement and lives of our clients’ employees. In addition to helping employees, we seek to improve the lives of their families for generations to come.

We are also proud of the recognition our clients received for strengthening their 401(k) plans and improving their employees’ retirement outcomes. For example, our clients at Dawn Food Products were recognized as the 2016 Plan Sponsor of the Year, and JX Enterprises won that same award in 2017. As Rich Yezzi, Jr., vice president of Human Resources at JX Enterprises says, “This award means more to us than any of the various industry awards we received because it represents the impact we have on the thousands of people who rely on us each and every day.”

 

PA: What benchmarks do you use to measure plan and client success? How do you react to clients or prospects who don’t share your goals for their retirement plan?

We measure plan success using a number of metrics including employee participation rate, contribution rates, if participants are properly invested, and what the income replacement ratio is.  Our targets for client plans are ambitious, but important. We strive for 90% employee participation with a savings rate of 10% of income. We also want 90% of participants to be in qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) options to effectively protect plan and employee resources.

By actively listening to clients’ goals as well as challenges, we collaborate to identify potential issues and then enhance the plan to meet revised goals that align with company values and meet their business needs while delivering better retirement plans for employees.

 

PA: What are the most important issues that your plan sponsors face with their company retirement plan, and what specific actions do you take to assist them in overcoming those issues?

Right now, the most important issue facing plan sponsors is how to improve the fiduciary governance process. Plan sponsors need to learn the lessons from employee retirement income security act (ERISA) litigation to ensure that fees are reasonable; that they are not using expensive share classes and that they are consistently following their investment policy statement (IPS). Our team helps clients meet all these challenges by working closely with plan sponsors to keep in step with their needs right now, but also help them see future issues on the horizon.

In the long term, we feel that plan sponsors need to better understand the cost they incur when employees cannot afford to retire. When this issue occurs, there are significant monetary and non-monetary costs absorbed by the business. These costs include higher wages, higher healthcare costs, lower productivity and a drop in morale. We help our clients proactively address these issues through solutions tailored to meet their individual company and plan needs.

We also conduct fiduciary education training sessions annually so clients are aware of the legal environment and their responsibilities. Our training provides a clear understanding of who has fiduciary responsibility, what are fiduciary objectives and finally – how to meet those fiduciary objectives.

To help our clients keep their plans strong, we regularly benchmark the fees they pay in relation to the services they receive to evaluate and document the reasonableness of plan costs. Each year we review all of the fund positions to determine if we are utilizing the lowest cost share class. We also document the actions taken and decisions made by the client to ensure that the policy statement is followed. We also prepare an annual fiduciary checklist to document these important measures.

We study actual employee data and plan health to determine the marginal cost of delayed retirement. This way the client is able to make intelligent and informed decisions about resource allocation. Often employees are reluctant to retire because of the uncertainty surrounding market volatility and the impact that it may have on retirement income. The lifetime income options that we have implemented in plans can remove that uncertainty so employees are able to retire with confidence knowing what their lifetime income will be.

 

PA: What challenges do you think the retirement plan industry faces and what role do you have in addressing and confronting those challenges?

The biggest threat facing the retirement plan industry, specifically defined contribution plans, is the potential of government intervention. This threat manifests itself in the form of a possible reduction in the allowed amount that can be contributed to a retirement plan. Without this powerful incentive, it will be more difficult for us to guide people to begin or continue retirement savings. The second potential government intervention involves an option where funds from company plans that are deemed weak could be moved into Social Security, under the rational of protecting employees’ future retirement. This is one of the reasons why our team works so closely with client plan sponsors to ensure fiduciary responsibilities are effectively met and their plans remain robust, which is better for everyone.

«