2016 RPAY – Newport Capital Group

Newport Capital Group believes it is important to thoroughly understand each plan sponsor’s goals for its company, so immediately upon starting with a new client, the practice asks it what issues are most pressing—both for the company and for employees. As the firm puts it, having an “open dialogue during onboarding sessions” is key.

“By asking these questions, some seemingly outside the realm of retirement plans, Newport Capital Group can realign the strategy to best fit the specific needs of that client,” says the firm. “Only by assessing the real aims of our clients can we craft a coordinated retirement strategy that best serves to incent, attract, reward, retain and eventually retire its work force.”

For example, the group may discover that a company is at risk of losing top talent to a competitor. Or that its defined benefit (DB) plan’s funding status is negatively affecting the company’s financial statements. Or that the company has a disproportionate number of older employees who are unable to retire and are costing the company high health care benefit premiums.

With this information in hand, the firm can work to assuage the finance department’s frequent motivation to keep retirement benefit costs down while meeting human resource (HR)s’ goal of attracting and retaining the best talent. Knowing the goals and the challenges of each employer, the advisory team can often make the case for automatic enrollment, re-enrollment and automatic escalation.

“Many of our clients are aware of some of the shifts in industry best practices and have even received feedback from their peers, but they are still hesitant to make changes,” says Dominic DiPiero, president of Newport Capital Group. “Plan sponsors assume a negative reaction from their participant base and have been concerned about adding costs to their bottom line. Taking things like this into consideration, we have found that framing these changes as a long-term benefit has resonated best in most cases.” Indeed, it appears to be working, as 87% of Newport Group’s clients use auto-enrollment, 52% use auto-escalation, and 99% offer an asset-allocation solution, such as a managed account or a target-date fund (TDF).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Once a client has been onboarded, the firm conducts annual plan health assessments, which reveal progress on already identified issues or may uncover new ones that can lead to further improvements in plan design, down the road.

Educating the Committee
In line with Newport Group’s emphasis on open communication at the onset of a client relationship, DiPiero refers to the firm’s initial process as a “two-way interview” that creates an open line of communication with all committee members. The adviser team’s service model also includes education that engages committee members with topics such as current best practices, legislative updates and regulatory issues.

The team’s model allows for customization, based on the needs of each client. Newport Capital acts as a 3(21) fiduciary for all of its clients and makes 3(38) fiduciary services available, as well.

“Part of our service model revolves around performing a fiduciary forensic audit on all new client relationships,” DiPiero says. “At the onset of the relationship, we perform the audit to bring the plan into the high standard we require as a co-fiduciary. During this process, we aim to uncover, rectify and document any existing plan-related issues. Competing this thorough analysis serves not only to protect the interests of the committee but also to set the foundation for a successful relationship between Newport Capital Group and our clients.”

While establishing a strong rapport with the sponsor and committee and improving plan design are vital, so is participant education, the firm believes. This is why it develops a tailored education policy statement (EPS) for each plan sponsor. “Increasing participation begins with a robust educational and communication initiative to explain to participants the importance of saving for retirement and to reiterate to employees the value of the benefit offered by their employer,” it says.

“Using our tailored EPS as a road map, we first identify the participant and demographic groups not contributing or participating in the plan,” DiPiero says. “We then work with the plan provider to target those employees directly, using language and methods specific to each individual or group.”

The next step is to increase deferrals. The firm scours the demographics and offers solutions specific to the groups that are either falling short in deferral amounts or are projected to be unable to replace enough income in retirement, DiPiero says. Again, using the EPS as a road map, the firm “deploys tailored educational and communication resources from the provider focused on changing participant behavior.”

Here is where Newport Group has found one-on-one education to be effective, so the firm has engaged providers that can supply “the same cutting-edge technology and methods that are offered by the most sophisticated wealth management firms,” he says. “By offering an education resource willing to sit down directly with participants and advise them, we’ve seen incredible success in increasing deferrals and helping participants achieve retirement readiness.”

Client Survey
Last fall, the firm hired Advisor Impact to conduct a confidential, Web-based survey of its clients. “We feel that asking our clients what they want from us, as their adviser, is the most important step to providing an unmatched client experience, as well as delivering cutting-edge services,” DiPiero says. “We also wanted to show our clients that we care about the quality of our relationships and services and, most important, give voice to their experience and opinions.”

The survey came back with a client satisfaction score of 99%. While “thrilled” with the results, Newport Capital decided to take the survey a step further with one-on-one brainstorming calls between DiPiero and the clients, starting this past January. Based on the clients’ feedback about what could help them with plan administration, Newport Capital will be designing an in-person and webinar seminar series to further educate plan sponsors on best practices.

The group plans to conduct another client survey within the next few years and has reinforced its open-door policy with all of its clients.

As to what the team takes the most pride in as retirement plan advisers, DiPiero says, it is “improving participants’ retirement readiness and helping them realize their future potential.”

BUSINESS AT A GLANCE

LOCATION: Red Bank, New Jersey
PLAN ASSETS UNDER ADVISEMENT: $8.5 billion
MEDIAN PLAN SIZE (IN ASSETS): $155 million
TOTAL PLANS UNDER ADMINISTRATION: 104
TOTAL PARTICIPANTS IN PLANS SERVED: 100,000-plus
SUPPORT STAFF: 15

2016 RPAY – Graystone Consulting – The Parks Group

PLANADVISER: Tell us about your practice and how you and your team members got into advising retirement plans.
The Parks Group: For more than three decades, our team has focused on bringing comprehensive consulting services to the retirement plan marketplace. Over the course of numerous market cycles, significant market corrections, and important changes to the legislative landscape, our institutional consulting team has successfully navigated these challenges in the focused and passionate effort to help more plan participants retire successfully. We fully realize that our valued client relationships allow us to positively impact the quality of retirement for thousands of 401(k) plan participants, and through our comprehensive fiduciary process have helped protect the interests of many plan sponsors as they seek to address their fiduciary duties.

Tom Parks, founder of The Parks Group, began his journey in 1981 at the institutional consulting group of EF Hutton. Through many organizational changes, corporate mergers and an array of corporate cultures, Tom’s singular focus on helping employees suitably prepare for retirement has remained unchanged. He has, however, embraced change in the marketplace and was one of the first adopters of encouraging plan participants to consider professionally managed portfolios within their investment menus.

PA: What is your mission statement?
PG:
 The Parks Group at Graystone Consulting is passionate about helping plan sponsors maximize their fiduciary protection. Our mission—through the development of a prudent fiduciary process—is to provide our institutional clientele with fiduciary protection. This is accomplished by providing plan sponsors with a “paper trail” of decision‐making designed to help address the considerable challenges posed by the mandates of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

To that end, we work diligently with our clients to develop an investment process that is structured to help protect the plan sponsor while helping guide plan participants towards successful retirement outcomes.

PA: Describe any particularly noteworthy initiatives you have led with your customer base in the past 12 months (investment, education, plan design or communication).
PG:
The Parks Group at Graystone Consulting focuses its efforts to include putting forth plan design recommendations designed to have “inertia” work to the benefit of the individual participant. Over the past 12 months these recommendations / initiatives have included:

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

  • Implementing automatic enrollment
  • Establishing higher default rates (i.e. moving from 3% to 6%)
  • “Stretching the match” (redesigning the match formula to encourage increased employee savings)
  • Implementing auto‐escalation
  • Increasing the auto‐escalation rate from 1% per year to 2%
  • Raising the contribution maximum to 10%, 12% or 15%
  • Instituting re‐enrollment procedures, which have dramatically improved plan success measures
  • Changing the “information architecture” for plans (i.e. listing long‐term performance first)
  • Changing the qualified default investment alternatives (QDIAs) to include only automatically diversified, professionally managed portfolios

These plan design initiatives have resulted in significantly improved participant success measures for many of our 401(k) clients.

PA: Describe a difficult client relationship issue, and how it was resolved.
PG:
Our work in the retirement plan marketplace has been particularly effective with several new clients. Near the end of 2014, our team began working with a new client in the health care industry that maintained five defined contribution plans. Our team had multiple interactions with the plan’s Recordkeeper as well as with the plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee and its board of directors.

The following objectives were accomplished over a nine‐month period:

  • Redrafted multiple Investment Policy Statements (IPS) to re‐assign committee responsibilities, streamline the decision‐making process and align the IPS with ongoing quarterly investment monitoring criteria.
  • Conducted a full investment due-diligence process on the investment menus. The result was one simplified investment menu consistent across all five plans that reduced the number of investment choices offered (while still offering appropriate diversification opportunities) and was more participant friendly.
  • Followed a thorough due-diligence process to select a target-date series that is appropriate based on the goals and objectives of the combined plans and specific employee demographics.
  • Changed the QDIA  to align the plans with current regulations.
  • Utilized a Fiduciary Benchmarks report to identify recordkeeping cost savings opportunities. The recordkeeper subsequently lowered its fees by 0.11%, which amounted to roughly $300,000 annually in dollar terms.
  • Worked with the recordkeeper to uncover an additional $400,000 in revenue to help offset future plan costs.

PA: As a retirement plan adviser, what do you take the most pride in?
PG:
 The process we have refined over many years of experience supports plan sponsors in fulfilling the extensive responsibilities of a fiduciary, maximizing their resources and—most importantly—helping their employees retire on time, successfully and with dignity.

PA: What benchmarks do you use to measure plan and client success? How do you react to clients or prospects who don’t share your goals for their retirement plan?
PG:
 On an annual basis, The Parks Group performs a fiduciary benchmark analysis for each client to assess their plan’s fees and participant success measures. Among others, we compare the plan’s participation rate, contribution rates for non‐highly and highly compensated employees, percentage of participants maximizing the company match and percentage of participants invested in automatically diversified options to a benchmark group comprised of similarly‐sized plans.

In addition, we look to the average tenure of our consulting relationships as a way to demonstrate the quality of the services we provide. We are pleased to report that the tenure of our average institutional client relationship is more than 10 years, with several relationships dating back more than 25 years.

BUSINESS AT A GLANCE

LOCATION: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
TOTAL ASSETS UNDER ADVISEMENT: $7.6 billion
MEDIAN PLAN SIZE (IN ASSETS): $75 million
TOTAL PLANS UNDER ADMINISTRATION: 55

«