Tactical Glide Paths

More TDF fund managers choose to deviate from a fund’s allocation.
Reported by Judy Faust Hartnett
During the market crisis of 2008, target-date funds (TDFs) came under significant scrutiny, which included examining glide paths and the funds’ potential response to markets.

“While most of the largest players design glide paths they can stick with, other managers are exploring ways to change their asset allocation in response to market changes,” says Alan Hess, senior analyst, U.S. fund research for Strategic Insights (an ISS company, like PLANADVISER).

Some of these fund managers have implemented tactical glide path deviation, allowing them to stray from the target mix if market changes suggest this is prudent. Fund managers must disclose this information if it is part of their investment strategy.

Not all fund managers use such a strategy. The 2019 PLANSPONSOR Target-Date Fund Survey showed an increase in the number of TDF products that permit the manager some tactical deviation from the glide path. There are now 42, up from 36 in 2017, when PLANSPONSOR last ran the survey.

When asked about her firm’s use of tactical deviation, Vice President of Product Strategy Lauren LaBarbera, with J.P. Morgan in New York City, said its tactical asset allocation process has existed since the inception of those particular funds. Tactical asset allocation “lets us react to significant market movements and gives us the ability to choose to rebalance or continue to maintain overweight or underweight positions in certain asset classes.”

Of the 10 fund managers with the largest assets (see chart), Strategic Insight found that only two managers, J.P. Morgan and John Hancock, have incorporated language into their target-date prospectuses that lets them alter glide path allocations; they may do this by up to 20%.

Tactical Deviations

Tactical Glide
Path Deviation
Q2 2019
Assets $mm
Vanguard Group Target Retirement Funds No 470,000
Vanguard Group Target Retirement Trusts No 311,000
FIAM Target Date Blend CITs No 32,300
FIAM Target Date Index CITs No 11,800
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Funds No 18,300
Fidelity Freedom Blend Funds No 3,600
Fidelity Freedom Funds No 185,00
Fidelity Freedom Index Funds No 34,800
Fidelity VIP Freedom Funds No 3,100
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend Trusts No 1,051
T. Rowe Price Retirement Funds No 120,081
T. Rowe Price Retirement Hybrid Trusts No 12,983
T. Rowe Price Retirement I Funds No 35,257
T. Rowe Price Retirement Trusts No 89,776
T. Rowe Price Target Funds No 2,145
American Funds American Funds Target Date Retirement Series No 131,000
JP Morgan JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend Mutual Funds Yes, 10%–20% 6,858
JP Morgan JPMCB SmartRetirement Commingled Funds Yes, 10%–20% 6,895
JP Morgan JPMCB SmartRetirement DRE Commingled Funds Yes, 7%–20% 15,633
JP Morgan JPMorgan SmartRetirement Mutual Funds Yes, 10%–20% 46,992
JP Morgan JPMCB SmartRetirement Passive Blend Commingled Funds Yes, 10%–20% 17,614
Nuveen TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Funds No 32,927
Nuveen TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Funds No 20,822
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic No 1,300
BlackRock LifePath Index No 189,200
BlackRock LifePath Smart Beta No 146
Principal Global Investments Principal LifeTime Funds No 22,317
Principal Global Investments Principal LifeTime Hybrid CITs No 40,570
Principal Global Investments Principal LifeTime Hybrid Funds No 1,515
John Hancock Investments John Hancock Multi-Index Lifetime Portfolios Yes, 10% 1,493
John Hancock Investments John Hancock Multi-Index Preservation Portfolios Yes, 10% 7,609
John Hancock Investments John Hancock Multimanager Lifetime Portfolios Yes, 10% 7,208
American Century One Choice Target Date Portfolios Yes 15,897
American Century Retirement Date Trust Yes 7,348
Data as of year-end 2017
Source: BrightScope, a business unit of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS)
Tags
tactical glide path, TDF,
Reprints
To place your order, please e-mail Industry Intel.