Wi-Fi, attractions, free breakfast and pet-friendly hotels
are choice, but for most travelers, it’s the whole package that counts when
choosing a hotel.
Whether it’s a budget motel or luxury beach-front resort,
travelers want to be sure they are getting the best property within their
budget, according to a recent AAA survey.
Most respondents (85%) cited overall value for money as the
top consideration for choosing a hotel. Most (87%) of respondents with annual
household incomes above $100,000 and 84% of respondents with annual household
incomes below $35,000 selected overall value as a priority.
Convenience to attractions or activities is important to
73%. Added benefits such as free breakfast (63%) and free hi-speed Wi-Fi (51%)
also ranked high when choosing a hotel.
Younger travelers cited free Wi-Fi as even more important
than other demographics, with 71% of respondents age 18 to 34 saying free,
high-speed Wi-Fi is a top consideration when choosing a hotel.
Among other findings:
Nearly half (48%) of women and those age18 to 34 surveyed
said they seek environmentally friendly programs when selecting a hotel.
Frequent travel programs or points are important to 35%.
Pet-friendly hotel policies matter to 29% and spas to 23%.
Children’s programs matter to 23% of respondents. Nearly
half (47%) of all people with children under age 13
consider a children’s program when booking a hotel.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
During National Save for Retirement Week, advisers might meet
with their plan sponsors to consider advice for plan participants, who
generally take positive action afterwards.
The gap between guidance and advice is significant, according
to David Ray, managing director, head of institutional retirement plan sales at
TIAA-CREF. “Two-thirds of people that engage in an advice session take action
by revisiting their asset allocation or increasing savings,” Ray told PLANADVISER.
“The take-action rate with guidance is much lower.”
The best way for people to get advice is from an adviser
through the employer retirement plan, TIAA-CREF found in its second
Financial Advice Survey. “The challenge we saw from the survey is that
people want to get advice, but they don’t know who they can trust,” Ray said. “They
appear to trust their employers, so providing it through a channel that
employees are comfortable in is important.” A third of employers offer advice,
according to Ray, and often people find their way to advice on the Internet.
“But just doing it online doesn’t suffice for most people. The opportunity of getting advice face to
face or on the phone is a much more effective way of delivering it.”
With the number of older and aging workers, Ray said, many
people need advice more than ever. Younger participants, age 18 to 34, have
longer to prepare for retirement, but Ray pointed out that many of them
graduated and hold a substantial amount of personal debt. “Advice might be
tailored to different populations: how do you build a budget; how to you manage
debt? People in their 50s will need to know how to build a nest egg and manage it through retirement,”
he said.
Plan sponsors as well as employees should be aware of the
difference between advice and education—an important difference—as well as the variation
in effectiveness for each. “A lot of service providers have been providing
guidance,” Ray said. Participants learn about asset allocation and different
ways of investing their savings, but they are not given advice on the
investment level. They are not given advice about what percentage of their
assets should be in various funds.
More Engagement
The level of care to provide advice is so much higher, Ray
said. Providers are “on the hook” for the advice they give, since it must put
the best interests of the participant first. The good news is that more
employees are engaged with their participant plans.
Because of the drop in the use of defined benefit plans,
people are increasingly wondering where their retirement savings will come
from. “In all sectors it is going to come down to what they put away for
themselves,” he said. Younger people realize they will need to start early.
“It’s not like homework. You can’t cram one night before retirement.”
The decisions that surround how to handle the accumulated
assets must also be addressed, Ray said. The question is not just when someone
retires but how a person retires. What form of income should they plan for? How
much should be placed into a lifetime income vehicle? Who can help make these
decisions? “The cognitive ability to make these decisions also begins to
decline,” he pointed out.
Perhaps the initiative should be National Lifetime Income
Week, Ray suggested. “That’s the challenge everyone is going to have to deal
with,” he said. “Say someone has been saving for 30 years
and has a big nest egg. Giving that big chunk of money to a firm in order to
receive regular checks is a very difficult decision to make.”
The numbers—10,000 people will turn 65 every day for the next
16 years—point to the coming crisis. “Quite honestly, one challenge is that we
don’t teach financial discipline to kids starting at a young age,” Ray said.
Even high schools and colleges rarely address personal finance and savings
behaviors. One way to make a difference would be changing the curriculum to
encourage saving at a young age, instead of starting with younger workers in
their 20s.
“I wish National Save for Retirement Week was every week,
instead of just one week of the year,” Ray said. “Especially for young people,
because of the importance of starting to save when you are younger. It’s a
great initiative, but maybe National Retirement Month would be more effective.”