Bad decisions, debt and for-pay work figure in parents’ new tough-love approach to teaching kids about money, finds T. Rowe Price’s 2015 Parents, Kids & Money.
The results indicate that
teaching kids about money today blends time-honored incentives (such as more
cash) with first-hand responsibility for thorny aspects of contemporary
personal finance.
“There is some evidence that
kids model their parents when learning how to handle money,” says Judith Ward, senior
financial planner at T. Rowe Price. And spending habits seem easier to pass
from parent to child than saving habits.
Proving that the apple doesn’t
fall far from the tree, “spender” parents—those who identify themselves as
spenders—are likelier to have “spender” kids (64%), Ward tells PLANADVISER.
Parents who self-identify as “savers” are more apt to have “saver” kids (52%).
“However, what isn’t said or
modeled is also important,” Ward cautions. “Kids don’t miss a thing!” The survey
found that more than half of kids (61%) think their parents worry
about money. And while 82% of parents think they are setting a good financial
example, fewer than half (46%) of kids say their parents are doing a
good job teaching them about money.
Sometimes, doing the opposite of
what parents model turns out to be a good thing. Ward says the survey found that
kids can learn from their parents’ mistakes. “In our Family Financial
Trade-offs survey, 55% of respondents said they that because their parents are
struggling with retirement (or will be), they decided to start saving for
retirement early so they won’t end up like their parents,” she says.
Parents want kids to learn about
money the hard way, and the survey found that many kids suspect their parents have told
them they can’t afford something when they really can (68%), while a smaller group feels their parents use the “do
as I say, not as I do” mantra when teaching them about finance (40%).
Among other findings of the survey:
More than half (58%) of parents let
their kids make bad financial decisions so that the kids learn from their own
mistakes.
More than half (52%) of parents
believe their kids should have their own credit cards to learn about managing
money, and 61% think it’s important for kids to have their own student loans so
that they can learn about debt and responsibility.
Kids don’t understand credit or
loans. Only about one in five (21%) feels knowledgeable about credit, and only
19% feel knowledgeable about student loan debt.
Kids also don’t think parents are
great teachers. Fewer than half (46%) say their parents are doing very or
extremely well at teaching them about money and finances. More than a third
(35%) claim to learn more about money at school than from their parents.
Most (70%) parents reported giving
their kids an allowance in 2015. In 2013, 47% of parents indicated that they
gave an allowance.
Most (85%) kids who get allowance
are required to earn it, compared with 15% of kids who get allowance with no
requirements. About half of parents surveyed reported
giving their kids $10 or less per week and almost one in 10 parents (9%) gives
kids $51 or more per week.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Acquisition Starts Search for Financial Education Technology
Corporate Insight analysts tell PLANADVISER the recently announced deal between LearnVest and Northwestern Mutual could be the start of a financial industry “technology feeding frenzy.”
It caused a lot of retirement industry chatter when
Northwestern Mutual announced last week that it is acquiring financial education technology provider
LearnVest, but relatively few concrete details have yet emerged about how the
acquisition and subsequent partnership will be shaped.
In announcing the deal, John Schlifske, Northwestern Mutual
chairman and CEO, said there has “been a gap between what consumers want and
what the financial industry has been able to offer” in terms of client-facing
technology. He suggests Northwestern Mutual will fill that gap by taking more
clients “from start to finish,” leveraging LearnVest’s digital capabilities to
address “all parts of the planning equation, and to be a partner at the center
of clients’ financial lives through all stages.”
Since then, plan sponsors and advisers alike have asked what
the acquisition means for the broader financial community—as have Corporate
Insight analysts Sean McDermott and Matthew Eschmann. The team of researchers
spends significant time tracking developments in the “robo-adviser” space. They
tell PLANADVISER this most recent deal fits nicely into the ongoing trend of expansion
and increasing influence for robo-advisers.
“The high-level comment to make first is that we really
expect the trend of technology-driven acquisitions to increase dramatically in
the years ahead,” McDermott says. “There is strong evidence that this
technology acquisition trend is going to develop into a feeding frenzy by the
mainstream industry players. They sorely need to shore up their technology
offerings in the face of client demand.”
As the pair explains, financial firms looking to improve technology
offerings and address the growing presence of robo-advisers are faced with a difficult
decision: The need to update technology offerings is clear, while the path
forward is anything but. “Do we do this technology development internally? Or
do we look for an opportunity to partner with someone or to acquire someone?
That’s the question firms are asking today, and this latest deal represents at
least a part of Northwestern Mutual’s answer. Others could take a different
path.”
For any given company the choice between internal and
external technology development is going to come down to the business model, resource availability,
cash flows and cultural factors, suggest McDermott and Eschmann.
“Some firms will find themselves better positioned, given their
internal staff and operations, to create their own unique and original
technology,” McDermott explains. “But many firms won’t be in this position. It’s
probably safe to say that most firms will likely find it easier and more
cost-effective to look externally for the answer to this problem. That’s the
conclusion Northwestern Mutual seems to have reached.”
One approach McDermott and Eschmann feel will become
increasing popular is something of a hybrid approach, which they describe as “white-labeled
technology” or the “B-to-B-to-C model,” short for business to business to
consumer services.
“We see this approach taking off big time in
the years
ahead,” notes McDermott. “This approach represents an independent
technology firm
selling its own proprietary tools as an ongoing and modifiable service
to a financial company.
The financial firm usually can plug the technology tools directly into
its own
existing website and then brand the tools with their own marketing
materials, without taking actual ownership of the technology.”
This is not the approach settled on by Northwestern Mutual,
the team notes, but they “are seeing a macro trend starting to emerge around
this theme. More and more fin-tech startups we talk to see huge opportunity in
the white-label approach. It allows major industry players and small independent
advisers alike to partner with a skilled technology firm and to use their solution.
I think this will become more and more common—more plug-and-play solutions that
seek to be really cost-effective.”
Eschmann adds that this white-label approach may be
appealing for firms that are worried about investing in their own proprietary technology—only
to see it outpaced and outperformed by all the new technologies constantly
being rolled out both inside and outside the financial services realm.
“If you’re going to spend all that time and money internally
to create a system, you might be afraid it will become obsolete by the time you
can even roll it out,” he explains. “There are really smart and driven technology
firms out there that do nothing but think about how to optimize robo-adviser
technology and where they can push and expand the technology moving forward. Can an
internal tech team compete with that? It’s an important question to ask.”
For large and well-established institutions in the financial
advisory space, the amount of red tape, internal politicking and corporate
inertia involved in creating entirely new and proprietary client service technology
will be a huge hurdle. This seems to be part of what Northwestern Mutual was
thinking when it decided to go with the acquisition route, Eschmann and McDermott
feel.
“Inside one of these really large and historic firms, by
the
time you get the ball rolling on the idea of improving the technology
versus
when it will actually get implemented, perhaps years later, there’s a
real risk
you will again fall behind on current client expectations,” Eschmann
adds. “I am not saying that this approach will never work. Some firms
will choose to go
internal, and they could benefit from having truly unique proprietary
offerings
and absolute control over their own system.”
The researchers say this highlights a critical issue that
has always plagued financial services firms looking to create unique technology
offerings: “In technology, more control and responsibility isn’t always preferable,
especially if there are trusted, capable and affordable partners you can turn
to instead.”
This specific deal between LearnVest and Northwestern mutual
will be a great test for the industry to see how a major and established
financial services provider can integrate a company created as an
industry-disrupter.
“There are key cultural differences that will have to be
addressed,” says McDermott. “Many of the robo-advisers made a big splash when
they first entered the space. Part of their whole ethos was to disrupt the
current financial services model and industry. They were storming onto the
scene to bring transparency and low costs to consumers, often in direct
opposition to the ‘older ways’ of doing business.”
The team feels many sponsors and advisers will be watching closely
to see if LearnVest can maintain its independent identity after being integrated
into Northwestern Mutual ownership. From the details that have emerged so far,
this is clearly the goal and intention of Northwestern Mutual—to keep the LearnVest
brand intact and independent.
“One reason why it might not be such a challenge on the
conflict of interest point to maintain the independent LearnVest identity,
is that the LearnVest technology does not make direct financial product recommendations,”
notes Eschmann. “It’s much more of an education and training platform for
participants. That shows me Northwestern Mutual is cognizant of this debate—they
don’t want to force LearnVest to start recommending only Northwestern Mutual products.
In some ways it would defeat the purpose of the deal, if they wanted to really
change how LearnVest does business.”
Eschmann goes on to explain the Northwestern Mutual likely
targeted LearnVest over other technology firms because “they are a company that
doesn’t really disrupt what Northwestern Mutual already does.”
“So in other words, LearnVest has this great technology platform
and great education, and they don’t really recommend specific investment advice, so it's a good fit,”
he says. “I think Northwestern Mutual really saw this as a great opportunity to
get that educational content and delivery system that can really appeal to
young people who are really only starting to invest. It gives Northwestern the chance
to say, ‘look how we are innovating with the times and making connections with
younger generations of investors.’”
Looking ahead, McDermott and
Eschmann expect LearnVest to
start churning out more retirement-plan specific educational
pieces—especially given that the LearnVest platform is to be integrated
directly into the Northwestern Mutual defined contribution (DC) plan
offerings, which already touch millions of plan participants across the
United States.
“The current content that LearnVest provides is
really
geared towards the young people out there in the market—the less
financially
savvy people who don’t have a lot of assets yet but who want to learn
more and invest
more and who will one day become promising clients,” Eschmann concludes.
“It is
still speculation, but perhaps we will see more of a focus on
wealth-protection
products, like the insurance products sold by Northwestern Mutual.
Again, they
will be focused on avoiding the perception of conflicts of interest
starting to
taint the LearnVest product, but there is no doubt this deal is going to
lead to very strong lead generation for Northestern Mutual’s insurance
agents.”