IRS Finds Widespread Final 5500 Errors

The majority of final Form 5500s reviewed during a recent Internal Revenue Service (IRS) compliance assessment contained errors, many related to undistributed assets.

The IRS’s Employee Plans Compliance Unit (EPCU) conducted a series of Form 5500 reviews as part of its Final Return with Assets project. EPCU auditors looked at plan sponsors who filed a Form 5500-series return marked “the final return/report” but listed assets at the end of the plan year to see if they had completed all the steps in terminating their plans. When errors were founds, auditors sought to determine why sponsors marked their Form 5500. They also examined whether there were common Form 5500 processing errors that caused returns to be unintentionally filed as a final return/report with end-of-year assets.

Over 90% of the responses showed sponsors made one or more of the following errors on their Form 5500:

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

  • Sponsor filed a Form 5500 marked the final return/report but still had assets in-plan at the end of the plan year. The IRS points out that, for the final return/report box to be marked correctly, sponsors typically must have distributed all plan assets.
  • Plan officials filed more than one Form 5500 marked the final return/report. The IRS explains that only one Form 5500 should be marked as the final return/report for any given plan, and it should be filed for a terminated plan only after all plan assets are distributed.
  • Sponsor distributed all plan assets after the end of the plan year but before filing the Form 5500. For example, sponsors often marked the 2011 Form 5500 as the final return/report for the plan year ending December 31, 2011. However, their plans still had assets on December 31, 2011, which were then distributed in 2012 before the filing deadline for the 2011 Form 5500 (July 31, 2012). Even though the plan distributed all plan assets before the due date of its 2011 Form 5500, the distribution was made in the 2012 plan year and not in the 2011 plan year. Therefore, the IRS says these sponsors should have filed and marked the 2012 Form 5500 as the final return/report.
  • Sponsor filed a Form 5500 for a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) plan. Plan sponsors shouldn’t file a Form 5500 for a SEP plan, the IRS explains. Instead, the entity that maintains the SEP-IRA files a Form 5498.
  • Plan officials didn’t check the “short plan year return/report (less than 12 months)” box. Plan sponsors should mark the short plan year box when filing a return for a period of less than 12 months and show the short plan year dates just above item A in Part I.

Less common errors occurred when the plan sponsor didn’t file a Form 1099-R for final plan distributions. The IRS requires plan sponsors to file Form 1099-R to report all plan distributions. Form 1099-R is generally filed for each person who received $10 or more from an employer-sponsored retirement plan. Sponsors also commonly failed to ensure three amended Forms 5500-EZ were processed and posted properly to the IRS’s monitoring system.

Planning tips

The IRS urges sponsors and plan consultants to review terminated plans to see if they have finished all the termination steps, including filing all current and prior Form 5500 returns, as well as a final Form 5500 showing zero assets (see “Fiduciary Liability and Form 5500 Reporting”).

Final Forms 5500 are required even if a plan is considered exempt from filing a Form 5500-EZ. The IRS says plan officials should take action to correct any errors and amend returns as necessary. Plan governance processes should be improved so the mistakes don’t happen again.

Questions about the final Form 5500 and the Final Return with Assets project can be emailed to epcu@irs.gov and should include “Final Return with Assets” in the subject line. The IRS also urges plan officials to consult its Form 5500 Corner, the Form 5500 instructions and the Form 5500-EZ instructions to fix and avoid errors.

Target-Date Funds Underperform in Q114

For first quarter 2014, target-date funds were muted in terms of performance amid healthy cash flows into the funds, says Ibbotson Associates Inc.

According to its “Quarterly Target-Date Fund Report,” the average target-date fund gained 1.5% in the first quarter of 2014, falling slightly below the returns of the S&P 500 and the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexes. As target-date funds typically comprise both equity and fixed income, the report notes that it is uncommon to see their performance fall below the two indexes.

However, the report notes, performance for the average target-date fund was hampered by diversification into non-U.S. equity markets, which underperformed domestic equity and bond markets in the first quarter. For the full 12 months ending in March, target-date funds experienced very strong performance with the average target-date fund ending the year with a 12.1% return as domestic equity markets had a great run. U.S. equities, as represented by the S&P 500, posted strong returns of 21.9% while its bond counterparts struggled with a 0.1% loss for the 12-month period.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

In addition, the report says:

  • Fund family performance was largely affected by the differences in international equity exposure and exposure to asset classes such as real estate and commodities. In the first quarter, fund families with less international exposures and those with more real estate and commodity exposure performed better than peers.
  • Flows into target-date funds continued at a healthy clip. Total assets in retail target-date funds were over $648 billion at the end of March, representing a 22% increase from a year ago.

As for target-risk funds during first quarter 2014, Ibbotson documented in its “Quarterly Target-Risk Fund Report” that target-risk funds gained 1.4% on average for the first quarter and 10.9% over the past 12 months.

As for target-risk funds during first quarter 2014, Ibbotson documented in its “Quarterly Target-Risk Fund Report” that target-risk funds gained 1.4% on average for the first quarter and 10.9% over the past 12 months.

During the quarter, returns were boosted by REITs, commodities and longer duration fixed income asset classes that are commonly used in target-risk programs. Over the last year, aggregate domestic fixed income securities (as measured by the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) posted a loss of 0.1%. This typically hurt more conservative target-risk portfolios.

In addition:

  • For the first time since fourth quarter 2012, target-risk funds saw outflows, with $1.5 billion in assets departing the category during the quarter, mainly from conservative-oriented funds.
  • Target-risk funds continue to see total assets climb to all-time highs. As of the end of first quarter, total assets in target-risk funds were more than $722 billion, a 12% increase from a year ago.

Ibbotson Associates is a registered investment adviser and a subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc.

«