August
saw a $15.3 billion net inflow to equity products, attributable to a
$15.1
billion net intake to international equity funds. Flow-leading
international equity strategies included international emerging market
equity ($2.7 billion), international equity alternative – other ($1.3
billion) and international total return ($1.2 billion).
Net
flows to U.S. equity were light at $200 million, but successful objectives in
the space included natural resources ($1 billion) and income – mixed ($864
million).
Demand
for bond funds in August persisted, with taxable bond funds attracting a
net
$10.3 billion and tax-free bond fund flows totaling $3.4 billion.
Flow-leading
objectives among bond funds included corporate bond general ($3.1
billion), government general ($2.8 billion) and government intermediate
maturity ($2.4
billion).
All
broad asset classes produced positive average returns in August, led by 3.8% on
U.S. equity funds, while mixed equity markets outside the U.S. returned an
average 1.5% for international equity funds. Taxable bond and tax-free bond
funds averaged 0.9% and 1.3% returns, respectively.
Money market fund net
deposits totaled $34.9 billion in August.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Researchers from
Oxford and BNY Mellon found Millennials in developed economies are twice as
likely to turn to parents for financial advice as they are to turn to banks or other
financial services providers, including retirement specialist advisers. Further,
according to “The Generation Game: Savings For The New Millennial,” nearly six
in 10 Millennials (59%) say financial services products are not targeted at
them, and less than one in 100 want providers to contact them via social media channels.
Researchers use
these figures to suggest there is a troubling communication gap between
financial services providers and the youngest generation of investors. What’s
worse is that financial services providers—from life insurers and banks to
asset managers and workplace financial advice providers—are failing to
connect with Millennials at a time when young people need the industry more
than ever.
For instance, Millennials face both increased longevity and
the erosion of state and employer retirement provisions, researchers observe. This
means they will have to save and invest more aggressively than their parents,
and must do so over a longer period.
According to the study, Millennials lack key knowledge about
even basic retirement planning concepts. The study reveals that pensions need
to be better explained to Millennials, for example, because nearly half (49%)
agreed that they did not know how pensions work. In addition, the study found Millennials are twice as likely to turn to their parents for financial advice
(52%) than to the next most popular source of information, their bank (24%). Just
shy of 16% of Millennials currently work directly with a professional financial
adviser. Other key findings show Millennials want products that demonstrate
clearly that they are being rewarded for tying up their money in long-term
investment vehicles.
Shayantan
Rahman, an Oxford student studying economics and management at the Saïd
Business School who was involved in the study, points to findings that show Millennials
are generally comfortable about receiving product information through social
media, but they do not want financial services providers using these channels
to contact them for a two-way conversation. “Rather than being the solution for
helping providers engage with Millennials, many told us they think it makes
them look ‘silly’, ‘pally’ or ‘creepy’,” he explains.
Given this difficulty in making contact with Millennials, how
can financial services providers rise to the challenges that the youngest
generation of workers face in creating a financially secure future? Some short-,
mid- and long-term solutions are shared in the BNY/Oxford report.
In the short-term, given Millennials’ reluctance to seek
advice from professional sources, firms need to find avenues to better equip
parents and other trusted parties to advise their children. Researchers suggests
providers can use traditional media to present tools to educate parents on
the retirement savings gap Millennials will likely face. The same indirect
pathway should be used to communicate the benefits of wealth compounding and
tax efficiencies within qualified workplace retirement plans.
An additional short-term goal should be to carefully
consider use of social media campaigns and take care not to damage credibility
among Millennials. Firms can build a reputation of trust and solidarity through
campaigns that do not appear too flighty or light-hearted, researchers
suggest.
In the medium-term, firms should consider ways to create a
better perception of the savings and investing industries. This is underscored
by Millennials’ reluctance to seek advice from sources such as insurance
representatives, consulted by less than 3% of Millennials.
In the long-term, researchers urge financial services
providers to work with policymakers to move away from a single purpose tax-incentive
retirement pot toward a tax-incentivized savings pot that allows for more flexible
and effective lifetime drawdowns. This will allow firms to capitalize on Millennials’
need to feel a sense of reward for their savings efforts, in the form of
tax-incentivized and compounding returns, while also granting their desire for
wealth accessibility in a more volatile economic environment.
The
full study from BNY Mellon and Oxford is available here.