Deals & People October 6, 2007

Harris Leaves McHenry Group for Consultant Rogerscasey

Institutional investment consulting firm Rogerscasey Inc. has hired Ward Harris as Managing Director, Financial Intermediary Group and T. Patrick Mulvey as Managing Director, Marketing and Business Development.
Reported by

Harris, previously President and CEO of the McHenry Group, will be responsible for leading the business management for all of Rogerscasey’s services for broker/dealers, banks, insurance companies, registered investment advisers, and other intermediaries that serve the retirement plan and high net worth marketplace. The McHenry Group will continue under the leadership of the current management team in California and Illinois.

Harris will be based in San Francisco, California and will report to Cindy Hargadon, Managing Director of Consulting Services at Rogerscasey.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Mulvey will be responsible for leading the firm’s sales and marketing efforts to introduce the firm to new distribution channels. A 25-year veteran of the investment industry, Mulvey comes to Rogerscasey from Los Angeles Capital, also having worked in several senior sales, marketing and relationship management roles from Wilshire Associates and Lazard Asset Management. Mulvey will report to Tim Barron, President and CEO and will operate out of the Darien, CT office.

Rogerscasey also announced changes to its Non-Traditional Research Group. Alan Kosan, Managing Director, has been appointed to lead the Research Team responsible for due diligence and research on all non-traditional investment managers including private equity, real estate, hard assets, hedge fund and fund of fund managers for Rogerscasey’s clients. Kosan has previously served as the firm’s Head of Private Equity and Co-Head of the Non-Traditional Research Group.

Rogerscasey has 112 employees, including 24 senior investment consultants and 30 research professionals, operating in five offices across the United States and one office in Dublin, Ireland. More information can be founds at www.rogerscasey.com.

Compliance October 5, 2007

Fiduciary Breach Suit Against Nationwide Survives a New Challenge

A federal judge in Connecticut has cleared the way for the trustees of five 401(k) plans to pursue their claims that Nationwide Financial Services was a fiduciary because it could change the plans’ investment lineups.
Reported by

The latest ruling by U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut in the six-year legal battle turned on a procedural issue: whether named plaintiffs Lou Haddock, Peter Wiberg, Alan Gouse, Edward Kaplan, and Dennis Ferdon had given up their right to make the fiduciary claim by not leveling the charge in the earlier versions of their complaint.

The trustees charged that Nationwide is a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) because it helped select the investment options made available for plan investments and because it had a unilateral right under its service contracts to stop offering certain investment options and substitute others. The trustees first filed a lawsuit in the case in August 2001.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Underhill, in a March 2006 order, turned away Nationwide’s dismissal request of allegations that it had engaged in an ERISA-prohibited transaction by keeping revenue sharing payments from providers of funds selected for the plans. Underhill ruled in the 2006 opinion that the plaintiffs had raised enough of an issue about whether the revenue sharing payments constituted plan assets under ERISA.

Plaintiffs charged that Nationwide, during the mid-1990s, began a system which saw fund providers making the revenue sharing payments based on the percentage of assets invested in each fund offering.

Nationwide subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, contending it was not subject to ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules because it was not a plan fiduciary and because the revenue-sharing payments were not plan assets.

In his 2006 decision Underhill denied the summary judgment motion, ruling that a reasonable jury could find that Nationwide acted as a fiduciary through its indirect control over the participant contributions made to the mutual funds.

The latest decision in Haddock v. Nationwide Financial Services Inc., D. Conn., No. 3:01cv1552 (SRU), 9/25/07 is here. Underhill’s 2006 decision is here.

«