Florida Toughens Laws for Annuity Fraudsters

A Florida law that went into effect January 1 includes stronger suitability requirements that agents must meet when selling an annuity to a consumer.

The bill also strengthens fines against agents who target Floridians using fraudulent annuities sales practices. Additionally, the legislation made it a third degree felony to submit a fraudulent signature and prohibits agents from using fake designations to falsely imply financial expertise, according to a press release from Florida’s CFO Alex Sink.

“This legislation represents a good first step,” Sink said. “We were able to increase protections for seniors and punish agents who commit financially devastating crimes. That said, I will continue to push for it to be a felony to intentionally deceive a senior into an inappropriate annuity product. And I’m not going to rest until we’re able to put unscrupulous agents that prey on our seniors behind bars.”

According to the release, highlights of amendments to F.S. 627.4554—Annuity Investments by Seniors are:

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

  • Agents licensed in Florida must take a minimum of three hours of continuing education about the subject of suitability in annuity and life insurance transactions.
  • Any person who willfully submits fraudulent signatures on an application or policy-related document commits a felony of the third degree.
  • Any agent who misuses a designation to imply they have specialized training or knowledge or misrepresents their actual qualifications, commits a violation of the unfair trade practices.
  • The law significantly expands the type of information the agent is required to collect from the senior consumer to determine suitability when recommending an annuity.
  • The law requires the agent to complete a detailed form comparing the benefits of the senior consumer’s existing annuity to the one being recommended by the agent as a replacement.
  • The law increases the period in which the consumer can obtain an unconditional refund if the consumer decides not to accept the life or annuity policy from 10 to 14 days from the date the policy is received.
  • The law imposes fine maximums of $30,000 for each willful violation of “twisting, churning and submission’ of fraudulent signatures.

Sink, who oversees the state’s department of Financial Services, created the Safeguard our Seniors (SOS) Task Force to develop solutions to better protect Florida seniors from falling victim to financial fraud. More information is available at www.flseniors.net.

Countrywide Crackdown

The recent legislation in Florida mirrors a regulatory trend nationwide to protect seniors from investment fraud. Both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have spoken out about the issue in the last year (see “
FINRA Offers Education on Early Retirement Scams’ and “Regulators to Share Best Practices in Working with Senior Investors’). Last summer, the U.S. Senate introduced a bill to protect senior investors from investment fraud (see “Bill Aims To Protect Senior Investors’).

Annuities are a specific point of concern for regulators, because the increasingly complex products are not governed by the same rules as other investments, which is why the SEC proposed extending securities rules to some annuities in order to protect senior investors (see “SEC Proposes Rule to Protect Senior Investors’). FINRA’s Rule 2821 also increased suitability requirements for the purchase or exchange of deferred variable annuities (see “As Good as Annuity’).

CFP Board Seeks Comment about Disciplinary Rules

The Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. (CFP Board), is looking for public comment about proposed revisions to its Disciplinary Rules and Procedures.

The Disciplinary Rules outline the CFP Board’s procedures for enforcing its code of ethics for Certified Financial Planner certificants, according to a press release.

The proposed revisions outline the duties of the Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (Commission), the body that administers disciplinary hearings, and the relationship of those duties to those of CFP Board’s board of directors, CEO, and legal counsel. The CFP Board said the revisions are intended to align the Disciplinary Rules with changes the Board made in February regarding oversight of the Commission and to establish stated policies for certain activities related to the Commission that are not specifically addressed in the current Disciplinary Rules. The proposals were developed through discussions with current and past members of the Commission.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

CFP Board’s Bylaws and Standards of Professional Conduct—which include the Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Rules of Conduct, and Financial Planning Practice Standards—do not require revisions to the Disciplinary Rules to be released for public comment. However, a board-appointed task force thought it important to seek further input from CFP Board’s stakeholders and recommended that the proposal of be released for a 30-day comment period, the CFP Board said.

An overview of the proposed revisions and a chart displaying the proposed revisions beside the current text of Article 2 can be reviewed on CFP Board’s Web site, www.CFP.net.

Any individual or group wishing to comment about the proposed changes should submit written comments no later than 5 p.m. February 2. Comments should be sent to CFP Board by e-mail to: compliance@CFPBoard.org,; or by mail to: CFP Board, c/o Michael P. Shaw, Esq., 1425 K St., NW, Suite 500, Washington, D.C. 20005.

Comments received will be posted to CFP Board’s Web site and considered by CFP Board’s Board of Directors when it meets in February.

«