Retirement Income: New Products, Old Challenges

Are target-date funds able to adequately provide a retirement income stream for participants?

That question was addressed at a panel at PLANSPONSOR’s recent Future of Asset Allocation Funds conference in Sarasota, Florida. New products are popping up every day to address the retirement income dilemma, but there are varied perspectives about the best products to implement and how to educate participants about them.

The retirement community lacks an adequate solution, said Stace A. Hilbrant, managing director of 401k Advisors, a National Retirement Partners (NRP) member firm. Overall, the industry does a “terrible job’ at providing retirement income for the average rank-and-file worker in America, he said.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Scott Warlow, assistant vice president for Strategic Asset Allocation at John Hancock, said that now that people are living 20 to 30 years in retirement, they face several risks, including longevity, inflation risk, and sequence of return risk. John Hancock is one company currently offering both an insurance product for defined contribution plans (Guaranteed Income for Life) as well as new managed payout products called Retirement Distribution and Retirement Rising Distribution (see “Funds Move to the Next Level’). Managed payout funds do not offer a guarantee, but rather wealth preservation with room for growth.

Several products in the insurance industry, such as John Hancock’s, have emerged in the last couple of years that embed into 401(k) plans in order to provide guaranteed income for life (see “The Inside Story’). Some of them can actually be utilized by participants in their 20s and 30s.

Steve Scanlon, head of global sales at AllianceBernstein Defined Contribution noted that it is unnecessary and costly for someone at 30 to implement a guarantee. He also said that the current products offered by individual insurance companies are not necessarily what plan sponsors are looking for, and a multi-insurer product embedded within a target-date fund—which AllianceBernstein is working on—would be a better fit. He said AllianceBernstein’s research found that the guarantee would help retirees invest in equities in order to produce adequate income, and that “most people will appreciate the confidence they have to invest even if they don’t use the guarantee.’

Henry Yoshida, a senior financial adviser at Merrill Lynch, said sometimes it takes education along with a nudge from the technology side to force participants to do the right thing. The challenge comes back to problems in the accumulation phase as well; participants need to be convinced to save enough in the first place.

Hilbrandt noted that a lot of responsibility is on the adviser right now. The vendor community has been trained to throw paper kits at participants, but advisers can help work with the “average American worker’ to buy an institutionally priced annuity, and not let the “wolves’ sell them a retail-priced annuity. “I challenge the adviser community to step up their education effort,’ Hilbrant said. “If we don’t do it, the government is going to do it.’

DALBAR Unveils QDIA Advisory Service

DALBAR has unveiled a service designed to help plan sponsors select a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA).

A DALBAR news release said the company’s QDIA Validation establishes a standard that fiduciaries and administrators can use to compare various QDIA products.

The QDIA Validation produces a detailed report that identifies compliance and deficiencies of each investment tested. Deficiencies that often exist can be self-corrected to avoid regulatory action, the announcement said. Unlike fund tracking, the QDIA Validation provides a line-by-line regulatory evaluation of each investment and applies uniform standards to the diverse types of investments that constitute valid QDIA alternatives.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

According to the announcement, the documentation includes:

  • Risk Assessment – The level of risk associated with the QDIA is associated with familiar consumer and investment risks using DALBAR’s Risk Table.
  • Applicability as a QDIA – By examining various factors, including risks and investment policies, strategies and objectives, DALBAR determines which QDIA alternatives represent appropriate uses for an investment under examination.
  • Qualification – DALBAR evaluates the investment and investment manager based on applicable Department of Labor regulations and guidelines.

Also, the announcement said, DALBAR compares each investment and the asset classes underlying the investment to respective standards or peers in the following categories:

  • Length of investment history (track record of investment and/or asset classes),
  • Stability and tenure of investment manager,
  • Assets under management (Size),
  • Consistency of holdings relative to investment strategies and objectives,
  • Correlation to style or peer group,
  • All fees and expenses in investment as well as any underlying investments,
  • Performance relative to assumed risk within asset classes, and
  • Performance relative to a peer group within asset classes.

More information is available at www.dalbar.com.

«