2014 RPAY – Joe Connell

PA: What have you done in the past year to improve participants’ retirement readiness?

Joe Connell: When we work with our clients, our process begins with a review of all previous communications and employee education meetings. We analyze what has been successful in the past and what has not worked for an organization. Then we build a five- to six-question survey to ask employees how they would like to receive communications and topics that interested them. A small raffle prize gets response rates to exceed 75%.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

We review this information with the employer, and we devise a customized approach to begin delivering a new employee education and communication program. We document our baseline for our goals and establish a target for our objectives, then implement the new strategy. After six months, we review the progress and tweak anything we may need to adjust, and then we continue for the next six months.

By developing education programs that are targeted to different demographic groups and created to meet specific employee requests—and that will also allow for changes as needed at the six-month mark—we have been successful in helping our clients to better prepare their participants for retirement and improve the overall health of their plans. A typical new client with retirement readiness percentages in the low 40% area will see a retirement-readiness improvement of more than 25% in the first year of the program.

PA: Describe any particularly noteworthy investment initiatives you have led with your customer base in the past 12 months.

JC: Our goal when working with our new clients in 2013 was to accomplish better diversification with fewer funds in most of the plan menus we inherited with our new clients. The typical fund menu we saw was using 30 to 32 funds. We have effectively used overlap analysis and correlation measurements to eliminate the use of unnecessary additional asset classes in many of our new plan clients. This has allowed us to better focus our education efforts in our employee meetings on proper asset allocation or using a managed account—and to not spend as much time trying to explain how to use many of the sector-specific funds in an appropriate manner to employees who may have invested in just one or two of those options.

Our investment committee’s review process is also shorter, and we feel we can add an asset class much more easily if we have streamlined our fund menu back down to 17 to 19 investment options.

PA: As a retirement plan adviser, what do you take the most pride in?

JC: Our role as a 401(k) plan adviser is a truly specialized one. Being a 401(k) plan adviser is about the participants and their beneficiaries. All of our decisions need to be based on that simple premise. We want our services to be measured in how we are able to help an organization’s employees reach their retirement dreams. Being able to work with employees over the course of many years, to be able to see those employees retire and have them thank you for helping them reach their retirement goals, provides us with all the incentive we need to stay passionate and motivated to help as many participants as we can. Those personal experiences with an organization’s employees are how we measure the success of our partnership with our plan sponsor clients, and it gives us a tremendous source of pride.


BUSINESS AT A GLANCE

Plan assets under advisement: $459 million

Median plan size (in assets): $17 million

Total plans under advisement: 27

Total participants in plans served: 8,250

2015 RPAY – White Oak Advisors

PA: What is your mission statement?

White Oak Advisors: Our mission is to: 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

  • Help our clients build and maintain a retirement plan structure that attracts, retains and most favorably positions their co-workers for a financially dignified retirement;
  • Help clients meet and manage their fiduciary responsibilities and mitigate fiduciary risk; and
  • Provide services and solutions to help all client employee constituencies to more successfully prepare for their retirement.

PA: Please describe any special education or communication initiatives you’ve undertaken with plan sponsors or participants.

WOA: As retirement plan specialists, we are well-versed in the various retirement plan design options available and the impact they have on plan results. We keep our clients up to date on legislative news and fully informed about industry trends and plan design features that can help maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of their retirement plans. We provide our retirement plan committees with an ongoing comparative analysis—via a dashboard report—of certain plan metrics each quarter, to help measure the overall competitiveness of the plan and how effectively it is operating and moving toward the goals established. White Oak has consulted with clients exploring a number of items, including automatic enrollment, auto-escalation features, streamlined investment menus, lifetime income solutions, Roth provisions and in-plan conversions, expense budgets, fund revenue equalization, asset-allocation solutions, outsourcing administrative duties and better overall fiduciary governance protocols. 

PA: As a retirement plan adviser, what do you take the most pride in?

WOA: Successfully shepherding and leading our clients, and their plan participants, to the fulfillment of their retirement plan goals within the context of the complexities of operating a business enterprise.

PA: What benchmarks do you use to measure plan and client success? How do you react to clients or prospects who don’t share your goals for their retirement plan? 

WOA: Our overall benchmark for a successful retirement program is one where the 90–10–90 philosophy is applied. These numbers are indicative of an average participation rate of 90% or higher, an average deferral rate of 10%, and investment in professionally managed asset-allocation choices at 90% or higher.

Additionally, we recommend automatic enrollment for all participants at an initial contribution rate of 6%. For plan sponsors that provide matching contributions, we often recommend stretching the match to lead participants to increase their savings amounts. Where there is a high concentration of assets in single or non-diversified investment alternatives, we will discuss the benefits of targeted communications and re-enrollment. 

When or if a client is unwilling or unable to follow our recommendations, we work with it to establish credible and measurable plan-specific benchmarks. We take a highly consultative approach and work to understand the various drivers, concerns and questions our clients face. 

PA: What are the most important issues your plan sponsors face with their company retirement plan, and what specific actions do you take to assist them in overcoming those issues?

WOA: Plan sponsors are faced with significant benefits/budget pressures across all employee constituencies, with little enterprise-wide integration of health and financial analysis. 

Health care spending continues to increase while, for many plan sponsors, an aging work force may contribute to lesser productivity, higher absenteeism and higher “presentee-ism.” Delayed retirement within their work force brings with it many costs that need to be identified and analyzed, all within the context of ultimately positioning employees for retirement with sufficient income replacement to live life well and independently post-retirement. 

BUSINESS AT A GLANCE

PLAN ASSETS UNDER ADVISEMENT: $2.45 billion

MEDIAN PLAN SIZE (IN ASSETS): $60 million

TOTAL PLANS UNDER ADVISEMENT: Not available

TOTAL PARTICIPANTS IN PLANS SERVED: 87,500

TOTAL NUMBER OF OFFICES: 2

«