“Ethical
Standards of Employee Benefit Practice” will address an employee benefits
practitioner’s ethical standards of conduct under Circular 230 for
communications with clients and the IRS. Other information will include:
an
analysis of the ethical rules for a practitioner’s duty of diligence in
obtaining accurate and complete information;
advising
clients on tax positions and potential penalties; and
Participants tend to stay in-plan for a time after retirement, research shows,
and may need help deciding how to preserve and maximize their account balance.
As defined contribution (DC) plans have started dominating the private sector
retirement plan landscape, providers and plan sponsors have become more
interested in the distribution decisions of older participants when they stop
working. These decisions can help address a key question, according to “Retirement
Distribution Decisions Among DC Plan Participants,” a paper from the Vanguard Center
for Retirement Research.
Should retirement income programs
designed to help participants translate account balances into income streams be
offered within qualified retirement plans? Or is the individual retirement
account (IRA) rollover marketplace the likelier destination for plan assets in
retirement?
One interesting statistic in the paper
shows plan participants just don’t stay in the plan, says Jean Young, senior research analyst
at Vanguard’s Center for Retirement
Research and a co-author of the paper. People who are of retirement age,
somewhere between three and five years after they have left a company, tend to
take their assets out of the plan. Fewer than 5% of participants make use of
in-plan installment options.
“We don’t know exactly why,” Young
tells PLANADVISER. She suggests a few reasons people move assets into an IRA.
They could be doing more holistic planning, she points out, and some people
have multiple retirement accounts from multiple employers and want to
consolidate their assets. “People are simplifying the structure,” Young says. “Most
people will sit down [at that time] and do some planning on their own or with a
professional.”
The rising importance of lump-sum distributions mean that participants
will need assistance in translating these pools of savings into a regular
income stream, the paper contends. Based on current retirement-age participant
behavior, most of these retirement income decisions will be made in the IRA
marketplace, not within employer sponsored qualified plans, although this may
evolve gradually with the growing incidence of in-plan payout structures. One
way sponsors might encourage greater use of in-plan distributions is by
eliminating rules that preclude partial ad hoc distributions from accounts.
Retirees Need a Plan
A single retirement plan account is not the total picture of what most
people have for retirement resources, and the spend-down phase is unique for
each person, Young points out. “That
account doesn’t reflect the entire household situation, which might include
other accounts, as well as the assets of a spouse or partner. The role for plan
sponsors and advisers is to provide the tools and the education to assist individuals
in figuring this out,” Young says.
The one standard, Young says, is
the need for an inflation-adjusted annuity stream to cover living expenses,
which requires people to sort through assets and accounts, and make a plan.
Research shows that participants
who have made a financial plan previously are in better shape than those that
have not, Young says. “We see that people who have started to plan in their 30s
and 40s are better prepared,” she says. “A third of individuals are doing the
right thing; another third make a reasonable adjustment to get there. And a
third are relying on Social Security and tend to have had lower wages
throughout their careers.”
Examining how participants decide to leave an employer’s plan after separating
and when they begin taking distributions can help plan sponsors decide whether
to go “to” or “through” in target-date funds (TDFs). The former suggests a more
conservative glide path, assuming assets are used immediately upon retirement.
The latter points to an investment strategy that recognizes that assets are
generally preserved for several years post-retirement.
Since the assets are not being used
for several years, the research shows, people have a longer time horizon. To
preserve assets through retirement, the equity allocation is 50% at the year of
retirement, and between the ages of 65 and 72 it goes down to a final equity
allocation of 30%. “You invest to retain assets longer,” Young says, “so that
suggests a ‘through’ approach instead of a ‘to.’ “
Market Not a Motivator
Young emphasizes that the research
includes older participants who terminated service in 2008 and 2009, years
marked by a global financial crisis and a severe decline in stock prices. Surprisingly,
the behavior of retirement-age participants was similar to that of both
earlier- and later-year groups.
Other findings from the paper are:
Preservation
of assets. Seven in 10 retirement-age participants (those age
60 and older terminating from a DC plan) preserved their savings in a
tax-deferred account after five calendar years. In total, 9 in 10 retirement
dollars are preserved, either in an IRA or employer plan account.
Cash-out
of smaller balances. The three in 10 retirement-age participants who
cashed out from their employer plan over five years typically hold smaller
balances. The average amount cashed out is approximately $20,000, whereas
participants preserving assets have average balances ranging from $150,000 to
$225,000, depending on the year of termination cohort.
In-plan
behavior. Only about one-fifth of retirement-age
participants and one-fifth of assets remain in the employer plan after five
calendar years following the year of termination. In other words, most
retirement-age participants and their plan assets leave the employer-sponsored
qualified plan system over time. Only 10% of plans allow terminated
participants to take ad hoc partial distributions. However, about 50% more
participants and assets remain in the employer plan when ad hoc partial
distributions are allowed.
Young says she finds it a little
surprising that more individuals don’t stay in the plan and take advantage of
the lower cost of investments negotiated by employers compared with the prices
they pay as direct retail investors. Some people want to simplify their
financial lives, she says, or some people do not understand the expense
structure of how they pay for investments. “I guess it’s a knowledge gap,” she
says.
The data in the analysis is from
Vanguard’s DC recordkeeping clients over the period January 1, 2004, through
December 31, 2012. Analysts examined the plan distribution behavior of 266,900
participants age 60 and older who terminated employment in calendar years 2004
through 2011. The average account balance of participants ranged from $106,800
to $149,400, depending on the year of termination. About half the participants had
account balances under $50,000, depending on the year of termination. Three in
10 retirement-age participants had worked for the plan sponsor fewer than 10
years, a factor affecting the number of smaller balances, since account
balances rise with tenure. About 45% of retirement-age participants had 20
years or more of job tenure. These longer-tenured participants had average
account balances of about $190,000.