New Head of Sales and Chief Marketing Officer at Transamerica
Transamerica Retirement Solutions has named Jason Crane, senior vice president, head of sales and Patricia Advaney, senior vice president, chief marketing officer.
The promotions happened in the wake of the retirement of Joseph Masterson, who was head of institutional sales and chief marketing officer.
“I’m excited about Jason and Pat taking on these new roles,” Stig Nybo, president of pension sales and distribution for Transamerica Retirement Solutions, told PLANADVISER. These changes are part of Transamerica “methodically creating what we want from a leadership team,” noted Nybo.
Crane, who has been with Transamerica for 12 years, will lead Transamerica’s sales efforts as head of sales across all retirement plan markets. “Jason is a student of the industry,” Nybo said, who “has brought tremendous success in the less than $20 million market.”
Advaney will serve as chief marketing officer for Transamerica’s retirement plans in all markets. She recently led the participant solutions effort and has been with the company for about 12 years.
Masterson retires from Transamerica after nearly 30 years with the organization. “Joe is a leader who set a really high standard,” Nybo said. “We thank him for his great work and contributions.”
Masterson spent many of his years working under the Diversified brand. Last year, it was announced that Transamerica Retirement Services and Diversified—both owned by parent Aegon—were going to move to one brand: Transamerica Retirement Solutions (see “Transamerica and Diversified to Combine Under One Name”).
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Legislation
introduced by Congresswoman Maxine Waters would give the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) the authority to impose user fees on investment
advisers.
A
ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, Maxine Waters
(D-Calif.) has introduced the Investment Adviser Examination Improvement Act
of 2013 (HR 1627), which would provide the SEC with a dedicated funding source
to strengthen adviser oversight.
“Public
confidence in our financial markets has deteriorated” since the financial
crisis, Waters said in a release, and inadequate funding levels are the reason.
(See “Budget Puts the
Squeeze on Adviser Exams.”)
Even
though the vast majority of investment advisers operate with integrity, Waters
said she felt it is clear that the SEC’s current examination levels need to be boosted
in order to restore public trust in the financial marketplace.
Waters
called the user fee the simplest and most direct method for achieving the
desired result, which is “improved quality and quantity of these exams, and
another step towards restoration of public confidence in our markets.”
Opinions
of the bill vary, but of course, even the definition of “adviser” does not mean
the same thing to everyone. According to James Sampson, a principal with
Cornerstone Retirement Advisors LLC, confusion still abounds about the
difference between wealth advisers and retirement plan advisers. “They still
look at me strange when I tell them I don’t have a trade blotter, because I
don’t place trades,” Sampson told PLANADVISER.
(Cont’d…)
“I get
plenty of scrutiny from the broker/dealer side of things, and I know my RIA,
which is affiliated through my broker/dealer, LPL, does as well, as they
recently completed a very thorough audit.” Sampson said he has no problem with
the SEC performing exams.
The
Investment Advisor Association (IAA), the trade association for investment
advisers, approved the legislation as providing “a stable source of funding to
SEC to be used for the sole purpose of enhancing investment adviser
examinations” without taxpayer dollars.
“Increasing
adviser examinations is good for both consumers and advisers,” said the
Financial Planning Coalition, which comprises the Certified Financial Planner
Board of Standards Inc. (CFP Board), the Financial Planning Association (FPA)
and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA).
“Investment
advisers play a huge role in the financial lives of millions of Americans, and
we should make sure that they’re acting properly,” said Rep. John K. Delaney (D-Md.), a
member of the House Financial Services Committee and an original co-sponsor of
the legislation. “In a time of tight budgets … [t]his legislation would allow
the SEC to improve oversight and help protect investors.”
Congress
recognized the problem of inadequate investor adviser oversight when it enacted
the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which tasked the
SEC with studying the best approaches for improving the investment adviser
examination system.
The
bill would also preserve the expanded role of state securities regulators
provided under the Dodd-Frank Act, which directs the SEC to focus on large
advisers—those with more than $100 million in assets under management.