At PLANSPONSOR’s Plan Designs conference in Chicago Wednesday, panelists offered an update about what is on the regulatory agenda in Washington.
There is a lot of buzz around fee disclosure but no final regulations. However, between lingering 408(b)(2) regulations from last year and legislation in Congress, it’s not clear what will ultimately happen in this area (see “Fees Are the Word“). What can plan sponsors and their advisers do now? Jason Roberts, an attorney with Reish Luftman Reicher and Cohen, expects that legislation and regulation around fee disclosure will come to fruition, even if it’s reworked. “In a nutshell, what we’re really at is full disclosure,” he said. Roberts said he is recommending that service providers use 408(b)(2) regulations as guidelines for what should be disclosed, until further regulations are proposed or finalized.
Ironically, implementing fee disclosure will make fees go up, noted Bridget Hagan, senior director of government relations at Nationwide. Another trend that could come out of more fee disclosure is more awareness around fees—which could actually lead to less litigation around the issue, suggested David Levine, principal at the Groom Law Group Chartered. “There is a growing realization that plans are not free,” he said.
Automatic Enrollment, Target-Date Funds
Automatic enrollment is popular with Congress, Hagan said. Legislators are likely to consider more in that area, possibly including mandatory automatic enrollment. President Obama’s budget proposed that companies with 10 or more employees that have been in business for more than two years that did not offer a 401(k) or other qualified retirement plan would have to automatically enroll their participants into IRAs (see “President’s Budget Aims to Boost Retirement Savings“). Although legislation in support of that notion this year has not yet been introduced, the concept stems from a bipartisan proposal dreamed up in a think tank years ago—which has received bipartisan support on Capitol Hill, noted Hagan.
In light of market turmoil, the varying composition of target-date funds have come under the microscope. Hagan expects there to be guidance from Washington about them this year. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Labor (DoL) are set to hold a hearing about target-date funds this month (see “More Details Released about Target-Date Hearing” and “401(k)s to Stay, but Expect Changes“).
The effective date of investment advice regulations, which updates the Pension Protection Act’s guideline for advice, were recently pushed back by the Department of Labor (see “EBSA again Extends Effective Date of Advice Rule’). Will they ever really happen? “It’s very possible that [those regulations] will never see the light of day,” said Levine.
Furthermore, that issue has been taken up by Congress in recent legislation introduced by Congressman Rob Andrews (D-New Jersey) that seeks to bar so-called “conflicted” advice, or advice given by investment advisers who do not receive level compensation (see “Andrews Legislation Raises Question“).
Roberts noted that the common feeling on Capitol Hill is that advice is good when it is done right. Regardless of what happens with the regulations and the legislation, advisers who are already independent will not really be affected.
As participants saw huge losses this year, creating a guaranteed income stream has been in the spotlight. Providers have developed several retirement income products in the last couple years, some of which can be embedded in plans (see “The Inside Story“).
Hagan noted that those products are difficult to communicate to participants because of their complexity; it might require a mandate in order to implement them. However, while there is an appetite for regulation around this, it is not high on Washington’s agenda. As Roberts said, while he expects to see fee disclosure regulation, regulation around guaranteed income products is not quite there yet.
It might not be clear what is coming down the road, but one thing seems clear, panelists noted: To use a catchword of the year, “change” is near.