Strategic Insight
Global Custodian
PLANSPONSOR
PLANADVISER
aiTrade
aiCIO
Philanthropy Management
Log in
Register
RSS
ADVANCED
Forgot Password?
|
Edit Your Profile
NEWS & OPINIONS
Investing
Research
Selling
Products
Compliance
Deals/People
Columnists
Diversions
RESEARCH
Investing
Recordkeepers
Selling
Practice Management
Plan Design
RESOURCE CENTER
Topics
Magazine
Multimedia
Newsletter
Roundtables
Conferences
PLANSPONSOR Institute
Web Site Design
Pathfinder
COMMUNITY
Blogs
Careers
News & Opinions /
Compliance
Home
/
News & Opinions
/
Compliance
/ SEC Files another Suit against BofA
SEC Files another Suit against BofA
Login to Recommend
January 13, 2010 --- The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) didn’t waste a breath in filing additional charges against Bank of America (BofA). ---
The SEC Tuesday charged Bank of America with violating federal proxy rules by “failing to disclose extraordinary financial losses at Merrill Lynch prior to a shareholder vote to approve a merger between the two companies.”
The SEC’s new
complaint
was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York a day after a federal judge said the charges could not be added to its pending court case against Bank of America (BofA) (see “
Judge Rejects New SEC Claims against BofA
”). That case, filed in August, alleges that Bank of America (BofA) misled investors about billions of dollars in bonuses that were being paid to Merrill executives and will go to trial March 1.
The complaint filed yesterday alleges that BofA learned prior to the December 5, 2008, shareholder vote that Merrill Lynch had incurred a net loss of $4.5 billion in October 2008 and estimated billions of dollars of additional losses in November. “Bank of America erroneously and unreasonably concluded that no disclosure concerning these extraordinary losses was required as shareholders were called upon to vote on the proposed merger with Merrill Lynch,” the SEC said.
The SEC’s complaint charges BofA with violating Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 14a-9 by failing to make any disclosure to its shareholders of the losses Merrill Lynch incurred in the two-month period leading up to the shareholder vote.
Ellie Behling
ADVERTISEMENT
2012 PA Top 100 List
Wal Mart and Merrill Lynch to Pay 13 5M for Excessive Fee Suit
DoL Issues Final Rule on 401k Fee Disclosure
PLANSPONSOR Names 2012 Retirement Plan Adviser and Adviser Team of the Year
408b2 Poses Concerns For B-Ds and Small-Plan Advisers
Charles Schwab Launches 401k Plan Solution
PLANSPONSOR Announces 2012 Retirement Plan Adviser and Adviser Team of the Year Finalists
Is Open Architecture Worth the Effort
The Hartford Puts Retirement on the Block
Wal Mart and Merrill Lynch to Pay 13 5M for Excessive Fee Suit
403b Plans - Siblings Not Twins
May-June 2009
SEC Committee Outlines Agenda to Help Protect Investors
Fee-Based Advisers Expect Growth
Plan Advisers Should Urge Sponsors to Prepare for 404a5
Fall 2006
Year in Review 2008
Cambridge Teams with Fiduciary Benchmarks
NFP Chair and CEO Bibliowicz Announces Plans to Step Down
Investor and Adviser Optimism on Rise
Vestmark Introduces Comprehensive Compliance Solutions for Fee Based Accounts
Neuberger Berman Bulks Up Investment Team
Got News?
If you have news of interest to plan advisers, email us at
news@planadviser.com
Site Map
About Us
Advertiser Services
Subscriber Services
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
FAQS
Glossary
Customer Service
Copyright © 1989-2012
Asset International, Inc.
All Rights Reserved. No Reproduction without Prior Authorization
GfJ432Hghb43dfs3dasds4at8