Resource Center / Magazine

Horse to Water

Corie Russell


Small-plan advisers who move to a fee-based model find challenges

58_KG-ED
Illustration by Katherine Guillen and Eleanor Davis

Transitioning to a fee-based model can present obstacles for small-plan advisers, notes Jim Sampson, managing principal at Cornerstone Retirement Advisors LLC, who says he discovered issues with recordkeepers and plan sponsors when moving his plan clients to a fee-based model from a traditional commission-based approach. Cornerstone’s book of business is now half fee-based and half commission-based, with all new business operating with fees.

Cornerstone is not alone in its transition to a fee-based model—advisers, as a whole, seem to be making the switch. In 2010, 52% of advisers were fee-based and just 11% were commission-only, according to a March 2011 report by Cerulli Associates.

In the retirement plan industry, however, much of that movement to fee-based service models is happening up-market, not in the micro-plan space.

For Sampson, whose target market is plans with assets between $2 million and $10 million, one issue when making the switch to a fee-based model was platforms, because of their different thresholds. Some platforms were unable to convert plans under $5 million to a fee-based arrangement, while others had a threshold of $1 million. Luckily, he has found a few platforms that offer the needed flexibility.

“The platforms out there are definitely getting better, but there’s still a lot of improvement to go,” Sampson says.

Recordkeepers have many reasons for keeping small plans in a commission-based system, he says. For some, their group annuity contracts require that commission be paid to a broker/dealer and do not recognize registered investment advisers (RIAs). 

It can also be a systems issue. Recordkeepers must be able to segregate the assets from the participants’ accounts, to facilitate the payment. “Not [all recordkeepers’] systems are set up for that in the small market, and they don’t want to invest the required capital to change their systems,” Sampson says. “I also think it’s partly the lack of demand. There aren’t a lot of advisers that operate in the small market that are fee-based advisers. That marketplace is mostly commissioned brokers, so [recordkeepers] cater to the audience.”

< Previous 1 2 3 Next >

ADVERTISEMENT





 

GfJ432Hghb43dfs3dasds4at8